Related articles |
---|
Microsoft .NET and its IL go7mog@microsoft.hotmail.com (gothmog) (2000-10-08) |
Re: Microsoft .NET and its IL andy@silverbrook.com.au (2000-10-10) |
Re: Microsoft .NET and its IL mal@bewoner.dma.be (Lieven Marchand) (2000-10-10) |
Re: Microsoft .NET and its IL vbdis@aol.com (2000-10-10) |
Re: Microsoft .NET and its IL joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2000-10-12) |
Re: Microsoft .NET and its IL ruff@mcst.ru (Andrey S. Bokhanko) (2000-10-12) |
Re: Microsoft .NET and its IL peter@razorsoft.com (Peter Drayton) (2000-10-15) |
[1 later articles] |
From: | "gothmog" <go7mog@microsoft.hotmail.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 8 Oct 2000 22:28:22 -0400 |
Organization: | Ireland On-Line Customer |
Keywords: | tools, question |
Isn't this the holy grail that UNCOL failed in achieving?
A unified IDE with plug-in languagues, compiling to a common IL, in
turn compiled to machine code before running. A common framework
library, that can be extended using any IL compatible language. Very
ambitious claims. Any thoughts on its success or failure?
[MS languages really only have one target, 32 or maybe 64 bit little
endian byte addressed machines using their ASCII-like character set
under Windows. That greatly simplifies the job. -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.