Related articles |
---|
[8 earlier articles] |
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser cfc@world.std.com (Chris F Clark) (2000-09-28) |
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser vbdis@aol.com (2000-09-28) |
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser phantom@southcom.com.au (Paul Nicholls) (2000-10-01) |
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser sebmol@gmx.net (Sebastian Moleski) (2000-10-01) |
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser irobot@swbell.net (Brian Webb) (2000-10-01) |
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser vbdis@aol.com (2000-10-01) |
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser vbdis@aol.com (2000-10-08) |
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser vbdis@aol.com (2000-10-08) |
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser aaron1000@webtv.net (2000-10-08) |
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2000-10-10) |
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser vbdis@aol.com (2000-10-12) |
From: | vbdis@aol.com (VBDis) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 8 Oct 2000 21:37:27 -0400 |
Organization: | AOL Bertelsmann Online GmbH & Co. KG http://www.germany.aol.com |
References: | 00-10-003 |
Keywords: | parse |
<phantom@southcom.com.au> schreibt:
> I don't see why a 3d view would be required and "syntax diagrams"
> because any computer language can be written as 2d diagrams.
With 3d I mean that a graph cannot be "flattened", when it contains
crossing connections. IMO such crossings are introduced into Delphi by
"Modula-ic" extensions to Pascal, like the Else part in a Case
statement. Here you'll find crossing rails in the Delphi 2 diagrams.
DoDi
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.