Re: Syntax diagram driven parser

vbdis@aol.com (VBDis)
8 Oct 2000 21:37:27 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[8 earlier articles]
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser cfc@world.std.com (Chris F Clark) (2000-09-28)
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser vbdis@aol.com (2000-09-28)
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser phantom@southcom.com.au (Paul Nicholls) (2000-10-01)
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser sebmol@gmx.net (Sebastian Moleski) (2000-10-01)
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser irobot@swbell.net (Brian Webb) (2000-10-01)
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser vbdis@aol.com (2000-10-01)
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser vbdis@aol.com (2000-10-08)
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser vbdis@aol.com (2000-10-08)
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser aaron1000@webtv.net (2000-10-08)
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2000-10-10)
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser vbdis@aol.com (2000-10-12)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: vbdis@aol.com (VBDis)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 8 Oct 2000 21:37:27 -0400
Organization: AOL Bertelsmann Online GmbH & Co. KG http://www.germany.aol.com
References: 00-10-003
Keywords: parse

<phantom@southcom.com.au> schreibt:
> I don't see why a 3d view would be required and "syntax diagrams"
> because any computer language can be written as 2d diagrams.


With 3d I mean that a graph cannot be "flattened", when it contains
crossing connections. IMO such crossings are introduced into Delphi by
"Modula-ic" extensions to Pascal, like the Else part in a Case
statement. Here you'll find crossing rails in the Delphi 2 diagrams.


DoDi


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.