Re: Syntax diagram driven parser

"Sebastian Moleski" <sebmol@gmx.net>
1 Oct 2000 00:24:43 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[5 earlier articles]
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser dimock@deas.harvard.edu (Allyn Dimock) (2000-09-28)
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser brian_d_webb@hotmail.com (Brian Webb) (2000-09-28)
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser brian_d_webb@hotmail.com (Brian Webb) (2000-09-28)
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser cfc@world.std.com (Chris F Clark) (2000-09-28)
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser vbdis@aol.com (2000-09-28)
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser phantom@southcom.com.au (Paul Nicholls) (2000-10-01)
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser sebmol@gmx.net (Sebastian Moleski) (2000-10-01)
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser irobot@swbell.net (Brian Webb) (2000-10-01)
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser vbdis@aol.com (2000-10-01)
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser vbdis@aol.com (2000-10-08)
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser vbdis@aol.com (2000-10-08)
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser aaron1000@webtv.net (2000-10-08)
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2000-10-10)
[1 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Sebastian Moleski" <sebmol@gmx.net>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 1 Oct 2000 00:24:43 -0400
Organization: T-Online
References: 00-09-177 00-09-199
Keywords: parse, Basic

What makes you think that the Delphi grammar needs 3D diagrams. IMO,
any EBNF grammar can be converted into railroad diagrams quite
easily. Since Delphi's grammar is indeed representable with EBNF, this
shouldn't be much of a problem.


sm

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.