Related articles |
---|
Syntax diagram driven parser brian_d_webb@hotmail.com (Brian Webb) (2000-09-24) |
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2000-09-24) |
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser phantom@southcom.com.au (Paul Nicholls) (2000-09-24) |
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser eodell@sfmedia.net (2000-09-25) |
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser dancohen@canuck.com (Dan Cohen) (2000-09-25) |
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser dimock@deas.harvard.edu (Allyn Dimock) (2000-09-28) |
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser brian_d_webb@hotmail.com (Brian Webb) (2000-09-28) |
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser brian_d_webb@hotmail.com (Brian Webb) (2000-09-28) |
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser cfc@world.std.com (Chris F Clark) (2000-09-28) |
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser vbdis@aol.com (2000-09-28) |
Re: Syntax diagram driven parser phantom@southcom.com.au (Paul Nicholls) (2000-10-01) |
[8 later articles] |
From: | Dan Cohen <dancohen@canuck.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 25 Sep 2000 13:21:09 -0400 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 00-09-173 00-09-176 |
Keywords: | syntax, parse, tools |
Joachim Durchholz wrote:
>...
> be a challenge. It's hard to beat text editors, and BNF is a text form
>...
I agree with both ideas: It seems like a neat idea to write a compiler
in diagrams (like a tool can generate Java from UML). It also seems like
a neat idea to work with BNF. Both UML and BNF are really really simple,
once you develop a little fluency.
Mostly, the "text editor" idea is an endorsment for "KISS", which is
always a neat idea, even though diagrams can be very seductive.
-- Dan Cohen in Calgary
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.