Related articles |
---|
Event based language, does it exist? polesen@nordija.com (Per Olesen) (2000-08-27) |
Re: Event based language, does it exist? dancohen@nospam.canuck.com (Dan Cohen) (2000-09-02) |
Re: Event based language, does it exist? cbbrowne@knuth.brownes.org (2000-09-02) |
Re: Event based language, does it exist? mihai@cs.wisc.edu (Mihai Christodorescu) (2000-09-02) |
Re: Event based language, does it exist? Joachim.Pimiskern@de.bosch.com (Joachim Pimiskern) (2000-09-07) |
Re: Event based language, does it exist? peter@abbnm.com (2000-09-07) |
Re: Event based language, does it exist? gneuner@dyn.com (2000-09-07) |
Re: Event based language, does it exist? wvenable@sfu.ca (Wayne Venables) (2000-09-08) |
Re: Event based language, does it exist? c_pew@mail.utexas.edu (Curtis Pew) (2000-09-08) |
[17 later articles] |
From: | cbbrowne@knuth.brownes.org (Christopher Browne) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers,comp.lang.misc |
Date: | 2 Sep 2000 16:17:55 -0400 |
Organization: | Giganews.Com - Premium News Outsourcing |
References: | 00-08-132 |
Keywords: | design |
Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw a time when Per Olesen would say:
>I'm trying to find a language which is based solely on events, but I
>do not know if it exists. What I do know is, that there is a whole lot
>of languages out there, so it should be strange if there isn't an
>event based one :-)
I would think that you're looking for a language based fully
on continuations; I seem to remember hearing about there being one,
but sadly do not recall the name.
I'd think that looking at functional languages like ML and
Haskell would be pretty worthwhile; having functions more-or-less
isomorphic to events seems fairly plausible...
--
cbbrowne@hex.net - <http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/lsf.html>
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.