Re: Event based language, does it exist?

cbbrowne@knuth.brownes.org (Christopher Browne)
2 Sep 2000 16:17:55 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Event based language, does it exist? polesen@nordija.com (Per Olesen) (2000-08-27)
Re: Event based language, does it exist? dancohen@nospam.canuck.com (Dan Cohen) (2000-09-02)
Re: Event based language, does it exist? cbbrowne@knuth.brownes.org (2000-09-02)
Re: Event based language, does it exist? mihai@cs.wisc.edu (Mihai Christodorescu) (2000-09-02)
Re: Event based language, does it exist? Joachim.Pimiskern@de.bosch.com (Joachim Pimiskern) (2000-09-07)
Re: Event based language, does it exist? peter@abbnm.com (2000-09-07)
Re: Event based language, does it exist? gneuner@dyn.com (2000-09-07)
Re: Event based language, does it exist? wvenable@sfu.ca (Wayne Venables) (2000-09-08)
Re: Event based language, does it exist? c_pew@mail.utexas.edu (Curtis Pew) (2000-09-08)
[17 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: cbbrowne@knuth.brownes.org (Christopher Browne)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers,comp.lang.misc
Date: 2 Sep 2000 16:17:55 -0400
Organization: Giganews.Com - Premium News Outsourcing
References: 00-08-132
Keywords: design

Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw a time when Per Olesen would say:
>I'm trying to find a language which is based solely on events, but I
>do not know if it exists. What I do know is, that there is a whole lot
>of languages out there, so it should be strange if there isn't an
>event based one :-)


I would think that you're looking for a language based fully
on continuations; I seem to remember hearing about there being one,
but sadly do not recall the name.


I'd think that looking at functional languages like ML and
Haskell would be pretty worthwhile; having functions more-or-less
isomorphic to events seems fairly plausible...
--
cbbrowne@hex.net - <http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/lsf.html>


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.