Related articles |
---|
Looking for new language features lingolanguage@hotmail.com (William Rayer) (2000-08-27) |
Re: Looking for new language features etoffi@bigfoot.com (2000-09-08) |
Re: Looking for new language features joachim_d@gmx.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2000-09-08) |
Re: Looking for new language features rhyde@cs.ucr.edu (Randall Hyde) (2000-09-09) |
Re: Looking for new language features guerby@acm.org (Laurent Guerby) (2000-09-09) |
Re: Looking for new language features mq@maq.org (2000-09-11) |
Re: Looking for new language features rosing@peakfive.com (Matt Rosing) (2000-09-11) |
[17 later articles] |
From: | "William Rayer" <lingolanguage@hotmail.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 27 Aug 2000 22:30:48 -0400 |
Organization: | Virgin Net Usenet Service |
Keywords: | question, design, comment |
Dear Newsgroup
Does anyone know of any resources, web sites, documents etc which have
details of new language features? What I am looking for is a sort of
wish list of features that could be included in a new computer
language. It does not matter if the features are complex or high level
or hard to implement, I'm looking more for ideas than implementation
detail.
Many thanks
Bill Rayer
[I hope not. Most languages have too many features already. PL/I
tried to incorporate every known language feature in the 1960s, and
ended up so ugly that in reaction people designed deliberately small
languages like Pascal. Recently bloat has come back into vogue, viz.
C++. -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.