Re: XPL Language

sjmeyer@www.tdl.com (Steve Meyer)
10 Aug 2000 00:08:48 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
XPL Language flass@Leginfo.LBDC.State.NY.US (Peter Flass) (2000-06-30)
Re: XPL Language imdave@mcs.net (Dave Bodenstab) (2000-07-01)
Re: XPL Language sander@haldjas.folklore.ee (Sander Vesik) (2000-07-18)
Re: XPL Language joachim.durchholz@halstenbach.com (Joachim Durchholz) (2000-07-23)
Re: XPL Language pld@fc.hp.com (2000-07-27)
Re: XPL Language andyj@mc.com (Andy Johnson) (2000-08-04)
Re: XPL Language ab528@freenet.carleton.ca (2000-08-04)
Re: XPL Language sjmeyer@www.tdl.com (2000-08-10)
Re: XPL Language duane.sand@compaq.com (Duane Sand) (2000-08-13)
Re: XPL Language sjmeyer@www.tdl.com (2000-08-27)
Re: roots (was: XPL Language) duane.sand@mindspring.com (Duane Sand) (2000-09-08)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: sjmeyer@www.tdl.com (Steve Meyer)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 10 Aug 2000 00:08:48 -0400
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 00-06-118 00-07-016 00-07-075 00-08-018 00-08-028
Keywords: history, design

On 4 Aug 2000 21:41:30 -0400, Heinz W. Wiggeshoff <ab528@freenet.carleton.ca>
wrote:


>"Andy Johnson" (andyj@mc.com) writes:
>> "Paul Dineen" <pld@fc.hp.com> wrote in message
>>> Sander Vesik (sander@haldjas.folklore.ee) wrote:
>>>: Peter Flass <flass@leginfo.lbdc.state.ny.us> wrote:
>>>: > A web site has been established for material related to the XPL
>>>: > programming language at:
>>>: > http://www.geocities.com/xpl_lang
>>>
>>>: > XPL, developed in the 1970's was one of the earliest "compiler


>
> My copy of A Compiler Generator, W.M.McK.,J.J.H.,D.B.W. is c/r 1970.
> Quoting from the preface, "The XPL system was developed by the authors
> over a three year period ...", thus making it a child of the 1960's.
>
>>>: > compilers", was widely ported, and was the basis for a number of other
>>>: > languages such as the PL/M family.


I think PL/M and XPL came from different worlds that did not
communicate. I think people saw XPL as too high level. I think PL/M
came from other system level languages such as PL/360 (?). My
recollection may not be right. I think it is amazing that at same
time those system implementation languages were considered great
advances, modern programming languages from BCPL to B to C was being
developed in obscurity. /Steve


--
Steve Meyer Phone: (415) 296-7017
Pragmatic C Software Corp. Fax: (415) 296-0946
220 Montgomery St., Suite 925 email: sjmeyer@pragmatic-c.com
San Francisco, CA 94104


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.