Re: Hashtable alternatives

rkrayhawk@aol.com (RKRayhawk)
4 Aug 2000 16:02:17 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Hashtable alternatives gwynfa@paradise.net.nz (Gwynfa) (2000-07-27)
Re: Hashtable alternatives bediger@teal.sni.net (Bruce Ediger) (2000-07-29)
Re: Hashtable alternatives rkrayhawk@aol.com (2000-08-04)
perfect hashing preston@tera.com (Preston Briggs) (2000-08-04)
Re: perfect hashing ceco@jupiter.com (Tzvetan Mikov) (2000-08-05)
Re: perfect hashing jsgray@acm.org (Jan Gray) (2000-08-09)
Re: perfect hashing jmochel@foliage.com (2000-08-10)
Re: perfect hashing fjh@cs.mu.OZ.AU (2000-08-10)
Re: perfect hashing parz@home.com (Parzival) (2000-08-10)
[5 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: rkrayhawk@aol.com (RKRayhawk)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 4 Aug 2000 16:02:17 -0400
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
References: 00-07-064
Keywords: theory

There is matter related to selecting hash techniques at


http://burtleburtle.net/bob/hash/perfect.html


entitled "Minimal Perfect Hashing", technical terminlology not empty
claims. The page and its links and downloadables are is very readable
for any experience level.


Some of the stuff was published in ( I think Dr Dobb's), but there are
updates at the site.


Also mention there is GNU gperf.


Robert Rayhawk
RKRayhawk@aol.com
[Perfect hashing is sometimes useful for a fixed table of keywords, but
you can't use it for a normal symbol table. -John]





Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.