Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| [3 earlier articles] |
| Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? mihai@cs.wisc.edu (Mihai Christodorescu) (2000-06-30) |
| Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? iank@idiom.com (2000-07-01) |
| Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? pedwards@dmapub.dma.org (2000-07-01) |
| Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? isaac@latveria.castledoom.org (2000-07-04) |
| Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? jerry@swsl.co.uk (2000-07-04) |
| Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? Frank.Gerlach@brokat.de (Frank Gerlach) (2000-07-18) |
| Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? chris@cjl1.demon.co.uk (Chris Locke) (2000-07-18) |
| Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? dforcier@allaire.com (Darren Forcier) (2000-07-18) |
| From: | "Chris Locke" <chris@cjl1.demon.co.uk> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | 18 Jul 2000 13:09:59 -0400 |
| Organization: | Compilers Central |
| References: | 00-06-112 00-06-125 |
| Keywords: | design |
<feriozi@my-deja.com> wrote in message news:00-06-125@comp.compilers...
>
> Re-entrancy just means that there is no global data. C++ is not needed
> for this.
I think that should read 'no global STATE'
global data such as state transition lookup tables are
obviously fine for re-entrant code.
Chris.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.