Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those?

Mihai Christodorescu <mihai@cs.wisc.edu>
30 Jun 2000 12:21:32 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? spamtrap@tic0.net (Tuukka Tikkanen) (2000-06-30)
Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? feriozi@my-deja.com (2000-06-30)
Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? idbaxter@semdesigns.com (Ira D. Baxter) (2000-06-30)
Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? mihai@cs.wisc.edu (Mihai Christodorescu) (2000-06-30)
Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? iank@idiom.com (2000-07-01)
Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? pedwards@dmapub.dma.org (2000-07-01)
Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? isaac@latveria.castledoom.org (2000-07-04)
Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? jerry@swsl.co.uk (2000-07-04)
Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? Frank.Gerlach@brokat.de (Frank Gerlach) (2000-07-18)
Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? chris@cjl1.demon.co.uk (Chris Locke) (2000-07-18)
[1 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Mihai Christodorescu <mihai@cs.wisc.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 30 Jun 2000 12:21:32 -0400
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 00-06-112 00-06-125
Keywords: parse, tools

On 30 Jun 2000 feriozi@my-deja.com wrote:


> It is hard for me to envision a case where multiple parses of the same
> stream would occur at the same time, or even in succession. The problem
> would be specifying the end marker, which must be a token outside of the
> grammar.


A case that come to mind is the parsing of HTML pages that include
{Java,J,VB}Script code. In this case two or more lexer/parser combos would
need to work on the same stream.
How is HTML + JavaScript parsing actually implemented? Does anyone
have any information about this (so I do not have to read the Mozilla
source code)?


Thanks,


Mihai


  Mihai Christodorescu -=- mihai@cs.wisc.edu - http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~mihai


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.