Related articles |
---|
Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? spamtrap@tic0.net (Tuukka Tikkanen) (2000-06-30) |
Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? feriozi@my-deja.com (2000-06-30) |
Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? idbaxter@semdesigns.com (Ira D. Baxter) (2000-06-30) |
Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? mihai@cs.wisc.edu (Mihai Christodorescu) (2000-06-30) |
Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? iank@idiom.com (2000-07-01) |
Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? pedwards@dmapub.dma.org (2000-07-01) |
Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? isaac@latveria.castledoom.org (2000-07-04) |
Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? jerry@swsl.co.uk (2000-07-04) |
Re: Anything better than lex & yacc? Everyone still using those? Frank.Gerlach@brokat.de (Frank Gerlach) (2000-07-18) |
[2 later articles] |
From: | "Ira D. Baxter" <idbaxter@semdesigns.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 30 Jun 2000 10:17:55 -0400 |
Organization: | Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com |
References: | 00-06-112 |
Keywords: | parse, tools |
You might consider the DMS Reengineering Toolkit,
(http://www.semdesigns.com/Products/DMS/DMSToolkit.html),
designed for large-scale software system analysis and modification.
DMS provides considerably more than just parser generators,
including automatic tree building, procedural or source-to-source
transformations, prettyprinting from trees, attribute evaluation, etc.
It also has definitions available for many languages, including C/C++
(even the preprocessor!). It can be used to build applications
having multiple parsers/prettyprinters.
DMS is well maintained, being a commercial product.
Alas, it is presently not a Unix-based product; runs on W/NT.
--
Ira Baxter, Ph.D., CTO idbaxter@semdesigns.com 512-250-1018x140
Semantic Designs, Inc., www.semdesigns.com FAX 512-250-1191
12636 Research Blvd #C214, Austin, Texas 78759
Tuukka Tikkanen <spamtrap@tic0.net> wrote in message
> Are lex and yacc (or flex and bison, if you prefer) still the only
> practical tools to go about making lexers and parsers?
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.