Re: Backtracking parsers

gneuner@dyn.com (George Neuner)
6 Jun 2000 23:17:37 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Backtracking parsers michael.finney@acm.org (Michael Lee Finney) (2000-05-30)
Re: Backtracking parsers gneuner@dyn.com (2000-05-31)
Re: Backtracking parsers adrian@dcs.rhbnc.ac.uk (2000-06-01)
Re: Backtracking parsers michael.finney@acm.org (Michael Lee Finney) (2000-06-01)
Re: Backtracking parsers gneuner@dyn.com (2000-06-06)
Re: Backtracking parsers michael.finney@acm.org (Michael Lee Finney) (2000-06-09)
Re: Backtracking parsers michael.finney@acm.org (Michael Lee Finney) (2000-06-10)
Re: Backtracking parsers cfc@world.std.com (Chris F Clark) (2000-06-14)
Re: Backtracking parsers gneuner@dyn.com (2000-06-20)
Re: Backtracking parsers michael.finney@acm.org (Michael Lee Finney) (2000-06-20)
Re: Backtracking parsers michael.finney@acm.org (Michael Lee Finney) (2000-06-20)
[1 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: gneuner@dyn.com (George Neuner)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 6 Jun 2000 23:17:37 -0400
Organization: Dynamic ReSolutions, Inc.
References: 00-05-111 00-05-119 00-06-015
Keywords: parse

I may be dense but I'm still missing something ... I don't see how
inline substitution of the constituant clauses in Prod1 is going to
make recognition context sensitive if the language itself isn't.


Even if the language is context sensitive and selection of the proper
alternative requires gestault knowledge independent of the ongoing
parse, I'm still left with the question:


How do you "continue" a parse of Prod3 that hasn't yet begun?




George Neuner
Dynamic Resolutions, Inc.

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.