Re: First and Follow sets

"Hybrid" <hybrid@dol.ru>
21 May 2000 22:31:24 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
First and Follow sets csuhu@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Jan Schulze) (2000-05-20)
Re: First and Follow sets rsherry@home.com (Robert Sherry) (2000-05-21)
Re: First and Follow sets johnston.p@worldnet.att.net (Paul Johnston) (2000-05-21)
Re: First and Follow sets hybrid@dol.ru (Hybrid) (2000-05-21)
Re: First and Follow sets tmoog@polhode.com (Tom Moog) (2000-05-22)
Re: First and Follow sets pfaffben@msu.edu (Ben Pfaff) (2000-05-24)
Re: First and Follow sets p.terry@ru.ac.za (Pat Terry) (2000-05-28)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Hybrid" <hybrid@dol.ru>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 21 May 2000 22:31:24 -0400
Organization: Demos Online Service
References: 00-05-074
Keywords: parse

Go to http://www.scifac.ru.ac.za/compilers , download "Compilers and
Compiler Generators" and read chapters 8..11.


It's less obt-... abstruse reading then Aho&Ullman&Sethi stuff.


"Jan Schulze" <csuhu@csv.warwick.ac.uk> asked
> .... that's me :-) ). Anyway, I was wondering if anyone could explain the
> construction of First and Follow sets to me, for example for the following
> grammar:

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.