Related articles |
---|
Incremental Compilers rinap@cisco.com (2000-05-08) |
Re: Incremental Compilers plakal@cs.wisc.edu (2000-05-10) |
Re: Incremental Compilers cascaval@leo.cs.uiuc.edu (Calin Cascaval) (2000-05-10) |
Re: Incremental Compilers richard@imagecraft.com (Richard F. Man) (2000-05-10) |
Re: Incremental Compilers markland@vnet.ibm.com (Matthew Markland) (2000-05-12) |
Re: Incremental Compilers HSauro@fssc.demon.co.uk (Herbert M Sauro) (2000-05-12) |
Re: Incremental Compilers mkent@acm.org (Mike Kent) (2000-05-12) |
[5 later articles] |
From: | rinap@cisco.com |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 8 May 2000 00:45:14 -0400 |
Organization: | Cisco Systems |
Keywords: | practice, performance |
Hi,
I am an engineer at Cisco and every engineer spends about 10 minutes
to compile an image even if only few of the files in the code base
were modified. I am wondering why that time cannot (in theory) be
reduced from 10 minutes to 10 seconds by using incremental compilation
AND LINKING.
Does anyone know if such compilers are available for unix environments
and are they really much faster than the normal compilers. What is the
status of this issue in Industry? Why do engineers in all the big
companies spend 10-15 minutes per compilation of big images even
though they may modify only a few lines at a time.
Thanks
Rina
rinap@cisco.com
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.