Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| Re: Re: genetic compilation rbw3@dana.ucc.nau.edu (Brock) (2000-04-01) |
| Re: genetic compilation dvdeug@x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu (2000-04-03) |
| Re: Re: genetic compilation joachim.durchholz@halstenbach.com.or.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2000-04-14) |
| Re: genetic compilation gneuner@dyn.EXTRACT.THIS.com (2000-04-20) |
| Re: Re: genetic compilation felix@anu.ie (felix) (2000-06-11) |
| Re: Re: genetic compilation joachim.durchholz@halstenbach.com.or.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2000-06-14) |
| From: | Brock <rbw3@dana.ucc.nau.edu> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | 1 Apr 2000 14:09:15 -0500 |
| Organization: | Compilers Central |
| Keywords: | optimize, architecture |
| In-reply-to: | 00-03-151 |
Why wouldn't it work for cross-compilation? It seems that the performance
measurement could be done just as well using a table of measured
performance values instead of doing the actual tests, thereby making it
quite possible.
--Brock
> I once read something about compilers that tried out equivalent
> machine code sequences and measured actual performance to decide which
> worked best. This could be used as a basis for a genetic algorithm.
> Of course, such an approach would drive compile times to a new high,
> and it wouldn't work for cross-compilation anyway.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.