Related articles |
---|
Compiler project needed pel@realtime.dk (Per Olesen) (2000-02-22) |
Semantic (Type) analysis phase question lojedaortiz@interlink.com.ar (Nicolás) (2000-03-23) |
Re: Semantic (Type) analysis phase question thp@roam-thp2.cs.ucr.edu (Tom Payne) (2000-03-23) |
Re: Semantic (Type) analysis phase question pmoisset@usc.edu (Pablo Moisset) (2000-03-25) |
Re: Semantic (Type) analysis phase question rkrayhawk@aol.com (2000-04-01) |
Re: Semantic (Type) analysis phase question tmoog@polhode.com (Tom Moog) (2000-04-03) |
From: | Pablo Moisset <pmoisset@usc.edu> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 25 Mar 2000 02:43:04 -0500 |
Organization: | University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA |
References: | 00-02-112 00-03-097 |
Keywords: | types |
As usual, it depends on your problem
You can overlap parsing and semantic checking phases in a single pass,
and it is not hard to do it...if the source language helps. If you are
compiling PASCAL is a piece of cake, however, if you are compiling a
language with forward references (like a call to a function that is
defined later in the same file, without using C-like prototypes or
PASCAL-like forward declarations ), it is better to create an
intermediate representation form first (during the parsing) and doing
all the checks in a later pass.
Hope this helps you
Pablo
"Nicolás" wrote:
> Where should I check for semantic correctnes (type correctness, mostly) ?
> Is it better to do it in the parsing phase, while I am building the parse
> tree, or to do it after I have a complete parse tree, traversing the tree
> in post order ?
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.