Related articles |
---|
[8 earlier articles] |
Re: Grammar ambiguity j.coulmance@itecor.com (Jocelyn Coulmance) (2000-02-19) |
Re: grammar ambiguity wclodius@aol.com (2000-02-21) |
Re: grammar ambiguity world!cfc@uunet.uu.net (Chris F Clark) (2000-02-27) |
Re: Grammar ambiguity joachim.durchholz@halstenbach.com.or.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2000-02-27) |
Re: grammar ambiguity joachim.durchholz@halstenbach.com.or.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2000-02-27) |
Re: Grammar ambiguity j.coulmance@itecor.com (Jocelyn Coulmance) (2000-03-03) |
Grammar ambiguity ma9vk@bath.ac.uk (Vassilis Kostakos) (2000-03-06) |
Re: Grammar ambiguity torbenm@diku.dk (2000-03-11) |
Re: Grammar ambiguity rodrigo.ferreira@dcc.unicamp.br (Rodrigo Augusto Barbato Ferreira) (2000-03-11) |
From: | "Vassilis Kostakos" <ma9vk@bath.ac.uk> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 6 Mar 2000 23:51:14 -0500 |
Organization: | School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, UK |
Keywords: | parse, question |
Would it be correct to say that an ambiguous grammar is a "wrong" one?
I believe that one language can be described by more than one grammar
(at least that's what I was taught). Therefore, we can change our
ambig grammar to an unambigious one. However, does this mean that
any ambiguous grammar is "wrong"?
[Nope. You might have a situation where any of the ambiguous parses
are acceptable, or external rules to choose which of a set of parses
to use. -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.