Re: Pronouns in programming language?

nr@labrador.eecs.harvard.edu (Norman Ramsey)
6 Mar 2000 00:28:41 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[11 earlier articles]
Re: Pronouns in programming language? jejones@microware.com (James Jones) (2000-03-03)
Re: Pronouns in programming language? cbrtjr@ix.netcom.com (Charles E. Bortle, Jr.) (2000-03-06)
Re: Pronouns in programming language? cbrtjr@ix.netcom.com (Charles E. Bortle, Jr.) (2000-03-06)
Re: Pronouns in programming language? mal@bewoner.dma.be (Lieven Marchand) (2000-03-06)
Re: Pronouns in programming language? carles.blas@uab.es (Carles Blas Anglada) (2000-03-06)
Re: Pronouns in programming language? zorn@microsoft.com (Ben Zorn) (2000-03-06)
Re: Pronouns in programming language? nr@labrador.eecs.harvard.edu (2000-03-06)
Re: Pronouns in programming language? neitzel@gaertner.de (2000-03-06)
Re: Pronouns in programming language? joachim.durchholz@halstenbach.com.or.de (Joachim Durchholz) (2000-03-06)
Re: Pronouns in programming language? ralph@inputplus.demon.co.uk (2000-03-11)
Re: Pronouns in programming language? genew@shuswap.net (2000-03-21)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: nr@labrador.eecs.harvard.edu (Norman Ramsey)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 6 Mar 2000 00:28:41 -0500
Organization: Harvard University
References: 00-02-149 00-02-154
Keywords: syntax, design

<pwagle@my-deja.com> wrote:
>I've also heard that some languages have experimented with permitting
>n-ary comparisons (eg, "1 < x < 10" instead of "x > 1 && x < 10", but
>they always conclude that its a mistake. Hard to understand code gets
>produced, and I think there's a parsing problem, but I forget what.


Icon does this beautifully, but its model of Booleans is
success/failure, not true/false. www.cs.arizona.edu/icon


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.