Related articles |
---|
[6 earlier articles] |
Re: Pronouns in programming language? hamish.a@virgin.net (Hamish Atkinson) (2000-02-28) |
Re: Pronouns in programming language? rkrayhawk@aol.com (2000-02-28) |
Re: Pronouns in programming language? ele@freesurf.ch (H. Ellenberger) (2000-02-28) |
Re: Pronouns in programming language? torbenm@diku.dk (2000-03-03) |
Re: Pronouns in programming language? schairer@dai.ed.ac.uk (Axel Schairer) (2000-03-03) |
Re: Pronouns in programming language? jejones@microware.com (James Jones) (2000-03-03) |
Re: Pronouns in programming language? cbrtjr@ix.netcom.com (Charles E. Bortle, Jr.) (2000-03-06) |
Re: Pronouns in programming language? cbrtjr@ix.netcom.com (Charles E. Bortle, Jr.) (2000-03-06) |
Re: Pronouns in programming language? mal@bewoner.dma.be (Lieven Marchand) (2000-03-06) |
Re: Pronouns in programming language? carles.blas@uab.es (Carles Blas Anglada) (2000-03-06) |
Re: Pronouns in programming language? zorn@microsoft.com (Ben Zorn) (2000-03-06) |
Re: Pronouns in programming language? nr@labrador.eecs.harvard.edu (2000-03-06) |
Re: Pronouns in programming language? neitzel@gaertner.de (2000-03-06) |
[3 later articles] |
From: | "Charles E. Bortle, Jr." <cbrtjr@ix.netcom.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 6 Mar 2000 00:21:16 -0500 |
Organization: | MindSpring Enterprises |
References: | 00-02-149 00-02-163 |
Keywords: | syntax |
Hello,
RKRayhawk <rkrayhawk@aol.com> wrote in message
> The moderator mentioned that
> << Cobol lets you elide comparison operands, something like
> IF FOO-BAR LESS THAN 12 OR GREATER THAN 42 THEN ...
> >>
>
> COBOL also has condition names which in effect allow elision of
> subject field name and relational! The condition name feature includes
> ranges and list of values. You can code something like
COBOL also has the MOVE CORRESPONDING verb to move data
with the same field name between records, which is pronoun-like.
--
Charles cbrtjr@ix.netcom.com
* http://pw2.netcom.com/~cbrtjr/wrdthing.html *
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.