Re: Pronouns in programming language?

Axel Schairer <schairer@dai.ed.ac.uk>
3 Mar 2000 08:59:43 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[4 earlier articles]
Re: Pronouns in programming language? jjones@cs.uiuc.edu (2000-02-28)
Re: Pronouns in programming language? mal@bewoner.dma.be (Lieven Marchand) (2000-02-28)
Re: Pronouns in programming language? hamish.a@virgin.net (Hamish Atkinson) (2000-02-28)
Re: Pronouns in programming language? rkrayhawk@aol.com (2000-02-28)
Re: Pronouns in programming language? ele@freesurf.ch (H. Ellenberger) (2000-02-28)
Re: Pronouns in programming language? torbenm@diku.dk (2000-03-03)
Re: Pronouns in programming language? schairer@dai.ed.ac.uk (Axel Schairer) (2000-03-03)
Re: Pronouns in programming language? jejones@microware.com (James Jones) (2000-03-03)
Re: Pronouns in programming language? cbrtjr@ix.netcom.com (Charles E. Bortle, Jr.) (2000-03-06)
Re: Pronouns in programming language? cbrtjr@ix.netcom.com (Charles E. Bortle, Jr.) (2000-03-06)
Re: Pronouns in programming language? mal@bewoner.dma.be (Lieven Marchand) (2000-03-06)
Re: Pronouns in programming language? carles.blas@uab.es (Carles Blas Anglada) (2000-03-06)
Re: Pronouns in programming language? zorn@microsoft.com (Ben Zorn) (2000-03-06)
[5 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Axel Schairer <schairer@dai.ed.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 3 Mar 2000 08:59:43 -0500
Organization: Dept of Artificial Intelligence, Edinburgh University, Scotland
References: 00-02-149 00-02-154
Keywords: design, Lisp

pwagle@my-deja.com writes:
> I've also heard that some languages have experimented with permitting
> n-ary comparisons (eg, "1 < x < 10" instead of "x > 1 && x < 10", but
> they always conclude that its a mistake. Hard to understand code gets
> produced, and I think there's a parsing problem, but I forget what.


Lisp has that for many operators and comparisons: (+ x1 x2 x3 x4),
(< x1 x2 x3 x4), and so on. I certainly have never heard that this
was considered a mistake in the lisp community. But then, because of
lisp's syntax, there is no parsing problem here at all.


I would be interested in knowing which other problems you have thought
or heard of, in particular, is the code hard to understand because of
the parsing problems (for the programmer), or are there other issues
involved?


Axel


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.