Re: lex and definitions

mzraly@world.std.com (Michael S. Zraly)
22 Feb 2000 09:32:56 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
lex and definitions hbotee@cise.ufl.edu (2000-02-15)
Re: lex and definitions C.vanReeuwijk@twi.tudelft.nl (Kees van Reeuwijk) (2000-02-21)
Re: lex and definitions mzraly@world.std.com (2000-02-22)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: mzraly@world.std.com (Michael S. Zraly)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 22 Feb 2000 09:32:56 -0500
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
References: 00-02-073 00-02-109
Keywords: lex

>>It Seems That There Should Be A Way To #Include
>>The Definitions In A File...


>A tool that I have written, Template Manager (or Tm for short), is also
>able to do file inclusions, and is quite intuitive to use. All you have
>to do is:
>
>.include partone.l
>.include parttwo.l


If all you want to do is file inclusion, how about using that old UNIX
standby, soelim? It should be part of either the GNU groff or perhaps
textutils distributions. The soelim syntax equivalent to the example
above is




.so partone.l
.so parttwo.l


--
Mike Zraly
mzraly@world.std.com

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.