Related articles |
---|
[6 earlier articles] |
Re: compilers using MMX instructions in the generated code olefevre@my-deja.com (2000-01-12) |
Re: compilers using MMX instructions in the generated code mlross@jf.intel.com (2000-01-12) |
Re: compilers using MMX instructions in the generated code andi@complang.tuwien.ac.at (2000-01-15) |
Re: compilers using MMX instructions in the generated code bcombee@metrowerks.com (2000-01-19) |
Re: compilers using MMX instructions in the generated code lindahl@pbm.com (2000-01-19) |
Re: compilers using MMX instructions in the generated code a.richards@computer.org (Andrew Richards) (2000-01-23) |
Re: compilers using MMX instructions in the generated code pica67@my-deja.com (Carsten Pitz) (2000-01-25) |
Re: compilers using MMX instructions in the generated code andrew@bhjz.demon.co.uk (Andrew Richards) (2000-02-04) |
From: | Carsten Pitz <pica67@my-deja.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 25 Jan 2000 00:00:45 -0500 |
Organization: | Deja.com - Before you buy. |
References: | 00-01-011 00-01-098 |
Keywords: | optimize, architecture, comment |
Well, the problem is well solved for FORTRAN. The FORTRAN compilers
for the Fujitsu VPP machines verctorize quite well. The FORTRAN
compilers for the Cray PVPs are not that league, but still acceptable.
But with C it is quite another story. No simple DO statements,
aliasing problems, etc. So I am very interested in how well your
compiler will do the job.
Carsten
[Well, gee, all the optimization problems are solved for Fortran, since
Fortran is carefully designed so that you're not allowed depend on stuff
that might get optimized away. -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.