<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Comp.compilers newsgroup</title>
      <link>http://compilers.iecc.com/</link>
      <description>The oldest and most popular online compilers forum.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <generator>Compilers RSS kludge 0.1</generator>
      <managingEditor>compilers-request@iecc.com</managingEditor>
      <webMaster>webmaster@iecc.com</webMaster>
      <item>
         <title>new codegen thoughts...</title>
	 <pubDate>Fri, 3 Sep 2010 17:46:26 +0000 (UTC)</pubDate>
	 <author>"BGB / cr88192" &lt;cr88192@hotmail.com&gt;</author>
	 <link>http://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/article/10-09-007</link>
	 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/article/10-09-007</guid>
	 <description>well, basically, here is the issue:
my compiler architecture has somewhat drifted from what it was originally,
and I am essentially considering writing a new codegen (to hopefully
eliminate the current mess).

original architecture:
C was parsed into an XML-based AST;
</description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Re: Books and other things which cost money to improve performance</title>
	 <pubDate>Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:45:19 +0000 (UTC)</pubDate>
	 <author>Paul Colin Gloster &lt;Colin_Paul_Gloster@ACM.org&gt;</author>
	 <link>http://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/article/10-09-006</link>
	 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/article/10-09-006</guid>
	 <description>George Neuner &lt;gneuner2@comcast.net&gt; sent on July 11th, 2010:
|"On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:05:30 -0400 (EDT), Paul Colin Gloster           |
|&lt;Colin_Paul_Gloster@ACM.org&gt; wrote:                                    |
|                                                                       |
</description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>New edition of Basics of Compiler Design</title>
	 <pubDate>Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:44:33 +0000 (UTC)</pubDate>
	 <author>torbenm@diku.dk (Torben Ægidius Mogensen)</author>
	 <link>http://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/article/10-09-005</link>
	 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/article/10-09-005</guid>
	 <description>I have made a new edition of Basics of Compiler Design.  The new
edition contains a new chapter about memory management and a lot of
smaller extensions and modifications.

As usual, you can download the PDF for free from
http://www.diku.dk/~torbenm/Basics/, or you can buy a printed copy
</description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Announce: XLR-Talk, a Google group for discussing the XL extensible language</title>
	 <pubDate>Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:44:17 +0000 (UTC)</pubDate>
	 <author>Christophe de Dinechin &lt;christophe.de.dinechin@gmail.com&gt;</author>
	 <link>http://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/article/10-09-004</link>
	 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/article/10-09-004</guid>
	 <description>XL (extensible language, see http://xlr.sf.net) now has a Google
group, http://groups.google.com/group/xlr-talk. You are welcome to
join us for discussions on this language based on parse tree rewrites,
or on more general compilation topics.

</description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Writing a managed compiler framework, suggestions/feedback?</title>
	 <pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:24:49 +0000 (UTC)</pubDate>
	 <author>Alexander Morou &lt;alexander.morou@gmail.com&gt;</author>
	 <link>http://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/article/10-08-016</link>
	 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/article/10-08-016</guid>
	 <description>I'm writing a managed compiler framework primarily focused on the .NET
Common Language Infrastructure, and I wanted some insight. I'm mostly
looking for what would be favorable/functionally acceptable when it
came to the various pre-compilation functions of a language's compiler.
</description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Compiler positions available for week ending August 29</title>
	 <pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:52:48 +0000 (UTC)</pubDate>
	 <author>"comp.compilers" &lt;compilers@iecc.com&gt;</author>
	 <link>http://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/article/10-08-015</link>
	 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/article/10-08-015</guid>
	 <description>This is a digest of ``help wanted'' and ``position available'' messages
received at comp.compilers during the preceding week.  Messages must
advertise a position having something to do with compilers and must also
conform to the guidelines periodically posted in misc.jobs.offered.
</description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>CFP: Virtual Execution Environments (VEE'11, California, Mar 2011)</title>
	 <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:52:26 +0000 (UTC)</pubDate>
	 <author>Erez Petrank &lt;erez@cs.technion.ac.il&gt;</author>
	 <link>http://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/article/10-08-014</link>
	 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/article/10-08-014</guid>
	 <description>2011 ACM SIGPLAN/SIGOPS
International Conference on Virtual Execution Environments (VEE'11)
Call for Papers
http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~erez/vee11/VEE_2011/Home_Page.html

March 9th-11th, 2011
Newport Beach Marriott Hotel
900 Newport Center Drive
Newport Beach, CA
</description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Seed7 Release 2010-08-22</title>
	 <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 02:14:31 +0000 (UTC)</pubDate>
	 <author>tm &lt;thomas.mertes@gmx.at&gt;</author>
	 <link>http://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/article/10-08-013</link>
	 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/article/10-08-013</guid>
	 <description>Hello,

I have released a new version of Seed7: seed7_05_20100822.tgz

In the Seed7 programming language new statements and operators
can be declared easily. Types are first class objects and therefore
templates/generics need no special syntax. Object orientation is
</description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Calculating resulting types of expressions</title>
	 <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:17:51 +0000 (UTC)</pubDate>
	 <author>Detlef Meyer-Eltz &lt;Meyer-Eltz@t-online.de&gt;</author>
	 <link>http://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/article/10-08-012</link>
	 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/article/10-08-012</guid>
	 <description>Last year I presented a small series of videos about an automated
translator from Java to C++. This translator wasn't able to calculate
the resulting type of expressions. Now there is an additional video
which demonstrates how such calculations are done at a translator from
</description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Re: Compiling C++ Templates as opposed to Preprocessing them.</title>
	 <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:08:09 +0000 (UTC)</pubDate>
	 <author>"Kenneth 'Bessarion' Boyd" &lt;zaimoni@zaimoni.com&gt;</author>
	 <link>http://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/article/10-08-011</link>
	 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/article/10-08-011</guid>
	 <description>On Jul 27, 3:06 am, Seima Rao &lt;seima...@gmail.com&gt; wrote:
&gt; Hi,
&gt;
&gt;     Can readers of this forum advise on whether it would be
&gt;     fruitful to consider compiling C++ templates to
&gt;     IR instead of preprocessing them?

I'm unsure what definitions of compiling and preprocessing you're
</description>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
