Comp.compilers newsgroup

Re: Articles/books that discuss separating the context-free part of a language from the context-sensitive part?

Wed, 22 May 2013 22:03:41 +0000 (UTC)

On Mon, 20 May 2013 10:53:39 GMT, anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) wrote: [snip] >That depends on the syntax of the language. E.g., at one time >Modula-2 was the language used in our introductory programming course >25 years ago, our students used to write things like

Re: Articles/books that discuss separating the context-free part of a language from the context-sensitive part?

anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) — Mon, 20 May 2013 19:04:48 +0000 (UTC)

"Costello, Roger L." writes: >The poster makes the point that most programming languages define a >context-free core, and then have additional algorithms which run on the parse >tree to filter out constructs that are illegal in the language:

CFP: MuCoCoS Workshop at PACT-2013 (Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, Sep 13)

Mon, 20 May 2013 19:04:19 +0000 (UTC)

CALL FOR PAPERS: 6th International Workshop on Multi/many-Core Computing Systems (MuCoCoS-2013) September 7, 2013, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK in conjunction with the 22nd Int. Conference on

Re: Articles/books that discuss separating the context-free part of a language from the context-sensitive part?

Mon, 20 May 2013 19:03:51 +0000 (UTC)

Gene Wirchenko wrote: (snip, I wrote) >>somewhere near where the problem is. For languages with reserved works, >>it is nice to say exactly what the problem is. It gets more > It is nice for any language. When parsing string, I tend to

Re: Articles/books that discuss separating the context-free part of a language from the context-sensitive part?

Mon, 20 May 2013 01:50:02 +0000 (UTC)

On Sat, 18 May 2013 00:18:54 +0000 (UTC), glen herrmannsfeldt wrote: [snip] >As I remember it, it is not so easy to do for recursive descent >parsers. As a result, as noted, you get poor error messages, such as: >

Seed7 Release 2013-05-19

mertesthomas@gmail.com — Mon, 20 May 2013 01:49:28 +0000 (UTC)

Hello, I have released a new version of Seed7: seed7_05_20130519.tgz In the Seed7 programming language new statements and operators can be declared easily. Types are first class objects and therefore templates/generics need no special syntax. Object orientation is used

Re: Articles/books that discuss separating the context-free part of a language from the context-sensitive part?

Mon, 20 May 2013 01:49:11 +0000 (UTC)

On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Costello, Roger L. wrote: > Are there any articles or books that discuss this technique? > > [That's been the conventional wisdom at least since I took a compilers > course in the early 1970s. I believe I mentioned it in lex&yacc and

Workshop on Essential Abstractions in GCC - 2013 (Mumbai, Jun 13)

Mon, 20 May 2013 01:48:41 +0000 (UTC)

Workshop on Essential Abstractions in GCC, 2013 (http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/grc/gcc-workshop-13) Organized by: GCC Resource Center (http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/grc). Venue: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, IIT Bombay (http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in).

Re: Articles/books that discuss separating the context-free part of a language from the context-sensitive part?

Sat, 18 May 2013 01:23:53 +0000 (UTC)

Costello, Roger L. wrote: > I read this fantastic post on the comp.theory list: > http://coding.derkeiler.com/Archive/General/comp.theory/2004-03/0189.html > The poster makes the point that most programming languages define a

Articles/books that discuss separating the context-free part of a language from the context-sensitive part?

Fri, 17 May 2013 22:47:35 +0000 (UTC)

I read this fantastic post on the comp.theory list: http://coding.derkeiler.com/Archive/General/comp.theory/2004-03/0189.html The poster makes the point that most programming languages define a context-free core, and then have additional algorithms which run on the parse