Re: ambiguity of grammar and LR(k)

Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>
31 Oct 1999 01:20:07 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[3 earlier articles]
Re: ambiguity of grammar and LR(k) Xavier.Nicollin@imag.fr (Xavier Nicollin) (1999-10-29)
Re: ambiguity of grammar and LR(k) henning@makholm.net (Henning Makholm) (1999-10-29)
Re: ambiguity of grammar and LR(k) mtimmerm@microstar.nospam-remove.com (Matt Timmermans) (1999-10-29)
Re: ambiguity of grammar and LR(k) nhartzell@macalester.edu (Nathan Hartzell) (1999-10-29)
Re: ambiguity of grammar and LR(k) Xavier.Nicollin@imag.fr (Xavier Nicollin) (1999-10-31)
Re: ambiguity of grammar and LR(k) Xavier.Nicollin@imag.fr (Xavier Nicollin) (1999-10-31)
Re: ambiguity of grammar and LR(k) henning@makholm.net (Henning Makholm) (1999-10-31)
Re: ambiguity of grammar and LR(k) henning@makholm.net (Henning Makholm) (1999-10-31)
Re: ambiguity of grammar and LR(k) uranus!ikastan@uunet.uu.net (1999-10-31)
Re: ambiguity of grammar and LR(k) linlist@fudan.edu (Linlist Leo) (1999-10-31)
Re: ambiguity of grammar and LR(k) sol!ikastan@agate-ether.berkeley.edu (1999-11-02)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,comp.compilers
Date: 31 Oct 1999 01:20:07 -0400
Organization: UNI-C
Distribution: inet
References: 99-10-130 99-10-137 99-10-168
Keywords: parse

Nathan Hartzell <nhartzell@macalester.edu> writes:


> > > S -> M | U
> > > M -> iEtMeM | a
> > > U -> iEtS


> the M rule is off just a bit. It should be M -> iEtMeU


Then


    if E then a else if E then a else if E then a


still cannot be parsed.


--
Henning Makholm

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.