Re: Generating Source Code.

"H. Ellenberger" <ele@freesurf.ch>
14 Oct 1999 01:23:06 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Generating Source Code. dara_gallagher@my-deja.com (1999-10-06)
Re: Generating Source Code. rod.bates@boeing.com (Rodney M. Bates) (1999-10-11)
Re: Generating Source Code. chase@world.std.com (David Chase) (1999-10-11)
Re: Generating Source Code. smith@gandalf.uni-trier.de (Craig Smith) (1999-10-11)
Re: Generating Source Code. cmilner@virginia.edu (Christopher W. Milner) (1999-10-11)
Re: Generating Source Code. anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (1999-10-13)
Re: Generating Source Code. thetick@jguru.com (Scott Stanchfield) (1999-10-13)
Re: Generating Source Code. ele@freesurf.ch (H. Ellenberger) (1999-10-14)
Re: Generating Source Code. vadik@siber.com (Vadim Maslov) (1999-10-16)
Re: Generating Source Code. chstapfer@bluewin.ch (Christian Stapfer) (1999-10-21)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "H. Ellenberger" <ele@freesurf.ch>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 14 Oct 1999 01:23:06 -0400
Organization: sunrise communications ag
References: 99-10-036 99-10-042
Keywords: tools

"Rodney M. Bates" wrote:


> [...] Two political problems:
>
> 1) Programmmers often have extremely strong feelings about formatting
> (myself included), and
> 2) It would be rare indeed to find any two whose formatting
> preferences agree.


OK, but some companies require their staff to use a set of rules or
a specific prettyprinter.


Is the situation in your country the same?


> All the better reason to abstract the formatting rules.


Yes.
HE

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.