Re: maturity of the c++ compiler technology

paul@toilet.dera.gov.uk (Paul)
11 Oct 1999 01:22:41 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
maturity of the c++ compiler technology Vincenzo.DeFlorio@esat.kuleuven.ac.be (Vincenzo De Florio) (1999-10-04)
Re: maturity of the c++ compiler technology ian@five-d.com (1999-10-06)
Re: maturity of the c++ compiler technology jkahrs@castor.atlas.de (Juergen Kahrs) (1999-10-06)
Re: maturity of the c++ compiler technology paul@toilet.dera.gov.uk (1999-10-11)
Re: maturity of the c++ compiler technology jandk@easynet.co.uk (Jonathan Barker) (1999-10-11)
Re: maturity of the c++ compiler technology per@bothner.com (Per Bothner) (1999-10-11)
Re: maturity of the c++ compiler technology joerg.brunsmann@FernUni-Hagen.de (Joerg Brunsmann) (1999-10-11)
Re: maturity of the c++ compiler technology Juergen.Kahrs@t-online.de (Juergen Kahrs) (1999-10-13)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: paul@toilet.dera.gov.uk (Paul)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 11 Oct 1999 01:22:41 -0400
Organization: Defence Evaluation & Research Agency
References: 99-10-023 99-10-029
Keywords: C++, GCC, comment

>An exercise to the reader: On page 46 of Bjarne S's book
>The C++ programming language (3.ed.) you find this simple program:
>
> http://www.research.att.com/~bs/hello_world.c
>
> #include <iostream>
>
> int main()
> {
> std::cout << "Hello, world!\n";
> }
>
>Find a compiler which is able to produce an executable for this program.


...




gcc 2.8.1.1 OK
gcc 2.95.1 OK (and only 6288 bytes with shared libraries!)


--
Paul Scott <pmscott@dera.gov.uk>
[Ah, right. The widely used 2.7.x is really quite old. -John]


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.