|YYLess equivalent in JLex email@example.com (Binesh Bannerjee) (1999-06-12)|
|Re: YYLess equivalent in JLex firstname.lastname@example.org (Gerwin Klein) (1999-06-14)|
|Re: YYLess equivalent in JLex email@example.com (Binesh Bannerjee) (1999-06-19)|
|Re: YYLess equivalent in JLex firstname.lastname@example.org (Gerwin Klein) (1999-06-27)|
|From:||Gerwin Klein <email@example.com>|
|Date:||27 Jun 1999 00:00:54 -0400|
|Organization:||Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Germany|
|References:||99-06-046 99-06-061 99-06-077|
Binesh Bannerjee wrote:
> JFlex seems to choke on %unicode or %full... Which isn't too encouraging...
> %7bit seems to work fine... What am I doing wrong? [..]
Nothing wrong with what you're doing. It's a bug, JFlex screws up
completely on this. I've reproduced it, and it's something in the
character-class code. There is a simple workaround though: just place
the the %full or %unicode switches before any macro declarations - it
will work then.
So instead of
I checked my tests, and all of them use this second style of "first
switches, then macros". That's why this bug slipped through. It's
another of those implicit assumptions. Bad thing for a test suite ;-)
BTW: the next release is due next week. It will be fixed then..
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.