|Intermediate language firstname.lastname@example.org (Jim Prince) (1999-04-18)|
|Re: Intermediate language email@example.com (1999-04-19)|
|Re: Intermediate language firstname.lastname@example.org (Mike Harrison) (1999-04-19)|
|Re: Intermediate language email@example.com (1999-04-19)|
|Re: Intermediate language firstname.lastname@example.org (1999-04-19)|
|Re: Intermediate language email@example.com (1999-04-22)|
|Date:||19 Apr 1999 14:58:33 -0400|
|Organization:||Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion|
Jim Prince <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I tried to start a discussion on intermediate languages and was
> unsuccessful. Thank you to the people that replied directly to me.
> What I would like is a discussion on the what, where, whys of
> designing an intermediate language. I have read the red dragon book
> and others and have been confused. I would like to abstract the
> problem, but do not have enough experience.
I missed your original post, but you might find
this paper interesting: http://www.antlr.org/papers/sorcerer.ps
It goes into details about representing a program as a tree and how to write
tree grammars and do tree transformations.
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.