Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| porting a compiler to a new architecture mathai@ecf.toronto.edu (1999-03-09) |
| Re: porting a compiler to a new architecture albaugh@agames.com (1999-03-10) |
| Re: porting a compiler to a new architecture jsgray@acm.org (Jan Gray) (1999-03-22) |
| Re: porting a compiler to a new architecture hawa@celsiustech.se (Hans Walheim) (1999-03-22) |
| Re: porting a compiler to a new architecture nr@labrador.cs.virginia.edu (Norman Ramsey) (1999-03-28) |
| From: | Hans Walheim <hawa@celsiustech.se> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | 22 Mar 1999 01:13:45 -0500 |
| Organization: | Compilers Central |
| References: | 99-03-036 |
| Keywords: | architecture, practice |
> I'm designing a RISC CPU for fun, and wanted to know how difficult it
> would be to port a compiler like gcc to generate code (non-optimized is
> fine) for my machine? I'm ignorant of compilers, but can learn .. I'd
> just like to assess how difficult it would be.
If you find gcc or lcc too intimidating you could try Small-C. You
should be able to get it to compile its own sources in 5-10 days. I have
a 32-bit version of Small-C at http://www.bahnhof.se/~inters/downld.html.
For more info about Small-C look in the comp.compilers FAQ.
Hans Walheim
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.