|Visual Parse 3.0: is it OK for me ? firstname.lastname@example.org (1999-03-05)|
|Re: Visual Parse 3.0: is it OK for me ? email@example.com (1999-03-06)|
|Re: Visual Parse 3.0: is it OK for me ? firstname.lastname@example.org (Markus Kohler) (1999-03-09)|
|Re: Visual Parse 3.0: is it OK for me ? email@example.com (1999-03-09)|
|Re: Visual Parse 3.0: is it OK for me ? firstname.lastname@example.org (Eddy Poullet) (1999-03-22)|
|Re: Visual Parse 3.0: is it OK for me ? email@example.com (Darren Forcier) (1999-03-23)|
|From:||Markus Kohler <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||9 Mar 1999 11:48:09 -0500|
|Organization:||Hewlett Packard GmbH, BSTD R&D|
oribu> I use an evaluation version of VP3.0. It seems pretty
oribu> bugged, and I really hesitate using it for my project.
oribu> - Does anyone have some serious working experience with
oribu> VP3.0 ? ...
I like ANTLR more than Flex/Bison because it's really object oriented
and at least it's predecessor produced human readable code.
oribu> will have to deal with tricky things like switching grammar
oribu> (for bilingual use) and syntax coloring. Which tool will be
oribu> more flexible ?
You might take a look at
They have a compiler-compiler available with source code, which they
used to implement Jikes a really impressive Java compiler.
Can't say a alot about it, but at least Jikes is fast and supports
incremental compilation which might be pretty cool for syntax
Markus Kohler mailto:email@example.com
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.