|[2 earlier articles]|
|Re: Reverse compilation of DSP code firstname.lastname@example.org (Grant Griffin) (1999-02-07)|
|Re: Reverse compilation of DSP code email@example.com (1999-02-07)|
|Re: Reverse compilation of DSP code firstname.lastname@example.org (Peter Guthseel) (1999-02-10)|
|Re: Reverse compilation of DSP code Juergen.Kahrs@t-online.de (1999-02-10)|
|Re: Reverse compilation of DSP code email@example.com (Norman Ramsey) (1999-02-10)|
|Re: Reverse compilation of DSP code firstname.lastname@example.org (Michael Lambertson) (1999-02-12)|
|Re: Reverse compilation of DSP code email@example.com (1999-02-15)|
|Re: Reverse compilation of DSP code firstname.lastname@example.org (Juergen Kahrs) (1999-02-15)|
|Date:||15 Feb 1999 23:04:31 -0500|
|Organization:||Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion|
"Peter Guthseel" <email@example.com> wrote:
> I dont think that the translation of assembly code to C is possible.
> Even with code that was compiled from C to assembly it is a problem to
> translate it back. I have heard in the past of several tools, but all
> i tried did a very bad job.
> When the Assembly code was made manually and was optimized i think
> there is no chance to translate it to C.
> The only possibility is if you are happy with very ugly C code,
> where every assembly command is translated to a C Function.
Not exactly. You will probably end up with something that looks like yacc
output - huge functions and lots of gotos. But still pretty ugly :)
> [For the most part I agree, although there's some interesting experimental
> work in trying to extract semantics from object code. -John]
Depends on what purpose you need this C source for. If you want to
recompile and run it as is then the answer is no, forget it. If you
just want to get some general ideas on what's going on, translation to
C might help for one reason - there are tools available for analysing
C sources, eg. building call graphs, xref tables, flow charts etc.
However I wouldn't do that unless absolutely necessary.
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.