|Project suggestion svp. email@example.com (1998-08-05)|
|Re: Project suggestion svp. firstname.lastname@example.org (1998-08-10)|
|Re: Project suggestion svp. email@example.com (1998-08-10)|
|Re: Project suggestion svp. firstname.lastname@example.org (Sergio Ruocco) (1998-08-10)|
|Re: Project suggestion svp. email@example.com (1998-08-10)|
|From:||firstname.lastname@example.org (Dwight VandenBerghe)|
|Date:||10 Aug 1998 10:10:20 -0400|
|Organization:||http://www.supernews.com, The World's Usenet: Discussions Start Here|
On 5 Aug 1998 22:23:33 -0400, email@example.com (Etienne
>Does anybody have any suggestions as to which (source) language I
>should choose for a compiler project. I'm considering to use java (and
>javacc) for the development of the compiler itself, and the java
>virtual machine as target. The source language can be anything not to
>difficult but interesting and useful enough to distribute the final
>compiler as freeware.
You might have a little more fun if you used Pizza, the functional
Java superset, for your compiler instead of straight Java.
The world could use a good Limbo-to-JVM compiler. Limbo is a
nice, clean language with IPC primitives, designed by Dennis
Ritchie for Lucent's Inferno OS. It's a small language, not
too many tricks, has Unicode strings and needs garbage collection.
In other words, it's a lot like Java, but smaller and tighter.
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.