Compiler Deisgn.

Matthew Webb <>
12 May 1998 22:17:10 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Compiler Deisgn. (Matthew Webb) (1998-05-12)
Re: Compiler Deisgn. (1998-05-15)
Re: Compiler Deisgn. (Kirk Abbott) (1998-05-15)
Re: Compiler Deisgn. (Gabor DEAK JAHN) (1998-05-16)
Re: Compiler Deisgn. (1998-05-27)
Re: Compiler Design. (Torbjorn Drevin) (1998-05-30)
Re: Compiler Design. (1998-06-03)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: Matthew Webb <>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 12 May 1998 22:17:10 -0400
Organization: none
Keywords: optimize, question

      I have written a disassembler and a comming assembler. I have not
studied compiler design and so do not know the best way of doing it. My
diassembler/assembler are bassically just one massive case statment on
the bytes or text strings. The look identical but the reversed. They are
just a single pass, nothing fancy.

Can anyone give another structure other than a case statment please?

Thank you.
Matthew Webb - London - Creator of alt.os.assembly & alt.os.develpoment

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.