|Compiler Deisgn. Matthew.Webb@net1.demon.co.uk (Matthew Webb) (1998-05-12)|
|Re: Compiler Deisgn. email@example.com (1998-05-15)|
|Re: Compiler Deisgn. firstname.lastname@example.org (Kirk Abbott) (1998-05-15)|
|Re: Compiler Deisgn. email@example.com (Gabor DEAK JAHN) (1998-05-16)|
|Re: Compiler Deisgn. firstname.lastname@example.org (1998-05-27)|
|Re: Compiler Design. email@example.com (Torbjorn Drevin) (1998-05-30)|
|Re: Compiler Design. firstname.lastname@example.org (1998-06-03)|
|From:||Matthew Webb <Matthew.Webb@net1.demon.co.uk>|
|Date:||12 May 1998 22:17:10 -0400|
I have written a disassembler and a comming assembler. I have not
studied compiler design and so do not know the best way of doing it. My
diassembler/assembler are bassically just one massive case statment on
the bytes or text strings. The look identical but the reversed. They are
just a single pass, nothing fancy.
Can anyone give another structure other than a case statment please?
Matthew Webb - London - Creator of alt.os.assembly & alt.os.develpoment
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.