Re: HELP: Using an abstract syntax tree for semantic checking

David Chase <chase@naturalbridge.com>
7 May 1998 16:48:38 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
HELP: Using an abstract syntax tree for semantic checking nealh@dinigroup.com (Neal Harder) (1998-05-04)
Re: HELP: Using an abstract syntax tree for semantic checking chase@naturalbridge.com (David Chase) (1998-05-07)
Re: HELP: Using an abstract syntax tree for semantic checking dwight@pentasoft.com (1998-05-07)
Re: HELP: Using an abstract syntax tree for semantic checking rod.bates@wichita.boeing.com (Rodney M. Bates) (1998-05-07)
Re: HELP: Using an abstract syntax tree for semantic checking thetick@magelang.com (1998-05-07)
Re: HELP: Using an abstract syntax tree for semantic checking donham@linex.com (Jake Donham) (1998-05-07)
Re: HELP: Using an abstract syntax tree for semantic checking ndc@alum.mit.edu (N. D. Culver) (1998-05-07)
Re: HELP: Using an abstract syntax tree for semantic checking adrian@dcs.rhbnc.ac.uk (1998-05-07)
[2 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: David Chase <chase@naturalbridge.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 7 May 1998 16:48:38 -0400
Organization: NaturalBridge LLC
References: 98-05-004
Keywords: parse, analysis

Have you considered an attribute grammar instead?

I know you can get a fine AG system from Declarative Systems
(sales@declarative.com), and I think that they're reasonably
priced (but I'm not certain). (Disclaimer: Rodney Farrow,
who works there, is a friend of mine, but he knows lots and
lots about attribute grammars and his used his system
to develop systems for processing languages like VHDL and
C++.)

David Chase
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.