|which is better, bison++ or bison-A2.6 firstname.lastname@example.org (Bret D Weinraub) (1998-02-12)|
|Re: which is better, bison++ or bison-A2.6 email@example.com (Alain Coetmeur) (1998-02-18)|
|From:||Alain Coetmeur" <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||18 Feb 1998 22:59:10 -0500|
|Keywords:||yacc, lex, C++|
As the (lone) builder of bison++-1.21-7 and flex++-2.3.7-8 I would givve all
my trust to flex2.5 and bisonA2.6...
flex2.4 have a very nice, and simple design and works well with bison++
bisonA2.6 is probably the evolution of bisonA1, which was very promising
at it's time... it must be good, yet I know nothing about it.
Flex++ and bison++ works well, but they have not evolved for years
(I have no time) and ahe an obsoleted basis (flex2.3 and bison 1.21)
If anybody know good c++ scanners/parsers I'm also veruy interested.
Alain Coetmeur. Informatique-CDC , mailto:email@example.com
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.