Re: Intel IA-64 Architecture

Roger Barnett <Roger@natron.demon.co.uk>
20 Nov 1997 22:34:25 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Intel IA-64 Architecture creedy@mitretek.org (1997-11-13)
Re: Intel IA-64 Architecture R.D.Potter@herts.ac.uk (1997-11-14)
Re: Intel IA-64 Architecture dlmoore@ix.netcom.com (David L Moore) (1997-11-14)
Re: Intel IA-64 Architecture mwolfe@pgroup.com (1997-11-15)
Re: Intel IA-64 Architecture meissner@cygnus.com (Michael Meissner) (1997-11-18)
Re: Intel IA-64 Architecture Roger@natron.demon.co.uk (Roger Barnett) (1997-11-20)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Roger Barnett <Roger@natron.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 20 Nov 1997 22:34:25 -0500
Organization: Real Objects Ltd
References: 97-11-077 97-11-088 97-11-090 97-11-102
Keywords: architecture, optimize

Michael Meissner <meissner@cygnus.com> writes:
>
> 2) I do worry that there seems to be less diversity amongst general
> purpose machines (with DEC seeming to throw in the towel, etc.), which
> means less of a need for compiler people :-(




Worry ye less, Samsung have announced the next generation Alpha (21264)
will be available in production quantities mid '98.


The DEC guys I've spoken to are generally bullish about having 2 (soon to be
3 ?) fabs for the Alpha and not having to pay for running or replacing any of
them - whether they are right remains to be seen.


--
Roger Barnett
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.