Re: lex: is NLSTATE always part of the language ?

vern@daffy.ee.lbl.gov (Vern Paxson)
26 Oct 1997 22:11:28 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
lex: is NLSTATE always part of the language ? Ralf.Reche@hamburg.sc.philips.com (Ralf Reche (CAT SDC Hamburg)) (1997-10-21)
Re: lex: is NLSTATE always part of the language ? vern@daffy.ee.lbl.gov (1997-10-26)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: vern@daffy.ee.lbl.gov (Vern Paxson)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 26 Oct 1997 22:11:28 -0500
Organization: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley CA
References: 97-10-106
Keywords: lex

In article 97-10-106,
Ralf Reche (CAT SDC Hamburg) <Ralf.Reche@hamburg.sc.philips.com> wrote:
> do ALL (or most) lex compilers define NLSTATE with this meaning?


Flex provides yy_set_bol(at_bol) to control this state. It does
not provide NLSTATE. Neither is part of POSIX.


Vern
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.