|ANTLR2 and JavaCC: Detailed comparison? firstname.lastname@example.org (Daniel Mahler) (1997-09-23)|
|Re: ANTLR2 and JavaCC: Detailed comparison? email@example.com (Terence Parr) (1997-09-27)|
|From:||Terence Parr <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||27 Sep 1997 01:05:52 -0400|
|Keywords:||lex, Java, tools|
Daniel Mahler wrote:
> Has anyone done a detailed comparison of ANTLR2 and JavaCC.
Sriram (Dr. JavaCC) and I are good friends from many years of
research/fun. In my biased opinion, I think the tools are simply
different styles with similar functionality. For example, his
syntax is more "code"-like, whereas mine is EBNF. I have stolen
ideas from Sriram as he has used PCCTS ideas so you should be shocked
if one tool had a pronounced edge over the other.
JavaCC has a DFA-based lexer that will treat you just like you're
used to ;) whereas ANTLR lexers use predicated-LL(k). Our's is
more powerful from a language recognition standpoint, but theirs
handles UNICODE, is fast and familiar (easier to specify).
So, really, it's style not functionality you should consider. :)
> I am particularly interested in their transformation components
> ie TreeParser and JJTree.
JJTree looks cool. Got a demo from Sriram the other day. A different
style of tree construction from ANTLR with some improvements.
In terms of tree parsing (not building), however, I am not sure if
they have a tree parser/transformer generator at this point. Perhaps
he can comment.
Hope this helps,
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.