|Cooking up a new language and need suggestions firstname.lastname@example.org (1997-06-10)|
|Re: Cooking up a new language and need suggestions email@example.com (Christian Jakobsson) (1997-06-13)|
|Re: Cooking up a new language and need suggestions firstname.lastname@example.org (Ray Dillinger) (1997-06-13)|
|Re: Cooking up a new language and need suggestions email@example.com (1997-06-13)|
|Re: Cooking up a new language and need suggestions firstname.lastname@example.org (1997-06-15)|
|From:||email@example.com (Sam Ravnborg)|
|Date:||15 Jun 1997 22:45:10 -0400|
On 13 Jun 1997 22:06:21 -0400, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
[snip - something about a new easy to understand language]
So far the things presented has only dealt with representing
From my point of view this could be done using an intellegent editor,
supporting different views of the expressions.
1) Raw format as presented to the commpiler.
2) Verbose format with spaces around all operators. Parantheses
controlled, mismatches highlighted.
3) Math format, representing expression in correct mathematical
4) Whatever you prefer.
Not that I thing languages of today couldn't be better! Some day I
will try to find out what that functional programming is.
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.