|The complexity snake eats its tail email@example.com (The Flanagans) (1997-05-19)|
|From:||The Flanagans <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||19 May 1997 23:21:36 -0400|
I work with smallTalk ( everyone turn your head and spit ) and
recently I've been looking at ways of making one of our formula
processors more efficient. This processor, written in smallTalk,
parses and executes equations one line at a time and often, is forced
to reprocess the same equation set many times from scratch. One
simple speed enhancement would be to reduce a given set of equations
into quads that would contain variable references so they didn't have
to be looked up repeatedly.
It seems ridiculous to write an intermediate code interpreter in a
high level language like smallTalk... but many times you are confined
to one language. I would like to hear any other stories about
"swatting a fly with the Aegis defense system" ( having to implement
low-level functionality in a high level language ).
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.