|Lots of things are happening with ACM TOPLAS firstname.lastname@example.org (1997-03-31)|
|gawk memory leak [was Re: Lots of things are happening with ACM TOPLAS email@example.com (1997-04-02)|
|Re: gawk memory leak firstname.lastname@example.org (1997-04-03)|
|Re: gawk memory leak email@example.com (1997-04-06)|
|Re: gawk memory leak pfoxSPAMOFF@lehman.com (Paul David Fox) (1997-04-13)|
|Purify patent (was Re: gawk memory leak) firstname.lastname@example.org (Elan Feingold) (1997-05-04)|
|Re: Purify patent (was Re: gawk memory leak) email@example.com (Sailesh Krishnamurthy) (1997-05-08)|
|Re: Purify patent (was Re: gawk memory leak) firstname.lastname@example.org (1997-05-08)|
|Re: Purify patent (was Re: gawk memory leak) email@example.com (Duncan Smith) (1997-05-09)|
|Re: Purify patent (was Re: gawk memory leak) firstname.lastname@example.org (Paul David Fox) (1997-05-13)|
|Re: Purify patent (was Re: gawk memory leak) email@example.com (Hans-Juergen Boehm) (1997-05-17)|
|From:||firstname.lastname@example.org (Chris Clark USG)|
|Date:||8 May 1997 21:20:26 -0400|
|Organization:||Digital Equipment Corporation - Marlboro, MA|
|References:||97-03-165 97-04-020 97-04-022 97-04-037 97-04-070 97-05-019|
> This surprises me, as Digital has a toolkit out there called ATOM
> (the OM standing for "Object Modification") and it ships a client,
> who's name escapes me at the moment, that has similar features as
> Purify. Anyone know the scoop on this?
The name of the client is Third Degree. Since patents and licensing
are legal issues, I would be real surprised if anyone "in the know"
commented on them in a public forum like this. It's just one of the
facets of an adversarial justice system and takes us on a path far
from comp.compilers. I look at the third degree code every day, as
part of one of my contracts, but I am not paid to make comments on
(either for or against) whether it violates any patents, and in fact,
I would be surprised if there weren't a contract clause keeping me
from volunteering such comments.
More importantly, I think there are a lot of "interesting" things in
third degree (some potentially relevant to comp.compilers) and most of
them are only tangentially (at best) related to the details of object
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.