|Safe ANSI C Subset Jan.Soderberg@mecel.se (Jan Soderberg) (1996-12-03)|
|Re: Safe ANSI C Subset email@example.com (Craig Franck) (1996-12-07)|
|Re: Safe ANSI C Subset firstname.lastname@example.org (1996-12-07)|
|Re: Safe ANSI C Subset email@example.com (1996-12-07)|
|Re: Safe ANSI C Subset firstname.lastname@example.org (1996-12-07)|
|Re: Safe ANSI C Subset email@example.com (Horst von Brand) (1996-12-10)|
|Re: Safe ANSI C Subset Roger@natron.demon.co.uk (Roger Barnett) (1996-12-15)|
|Re: Safe ANSI C Subset firstname.lastname@example.org (Dave Mason) (1997-01-09)|
|From:||Roger Barnett <Roger@natron.demon.co.uk>|
|Date:||15 Dec 1996 16:12:48 -0500|
|Organization:||Natron Software Maintenance Ltd|
Jan Soderberg (Jan.Soderberg@mecel.se) wrote:
> Does anyone know of any ANSI C subsets defined for safety critical
> real-time applications?
email@example.com (Mark van der Aalst) writes:
> I am not aware of any subsets of 'C' wich handle this sort of thing, I
> do know that most military applications (at least in this country) are
> written in plain 'C' ...
Is this because they decided that C was safer than the RTL/2
language which was quite widespread over there ten years ago ?
[ I ask this because we used to be told that Ada was replacing
all of the RTL/2 because of its superior safety features - to
hear that in fact all this stuff is now written in C is a little ironic
but totally unsurprising. ]
Natron Software Ltd, York, England
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.