|Help! Evaluating Many Logical Expressions firstname.lastname@example.org (1996-10-10)|
|Re: Help! Evaluating Many Logical Expressions email@example.com (1996-10-13)|
|From:||firstname.lastname@example.org (Ilias Kastanas)|
|Date:||13 Oct 1996 12:44:59 -0400|
|Organization:||Caltech Alumni Association|
|Expires:||October 22, 1996|
Dinesh Somkani <email@example.com> wrote:
>I have a requirement to evaluate, real-time, a logical expression made up
>of many relational expressions.
>The given expression looks something like this:
> A && B && C
>or, somewhat more complex, with lots of parentheses and all.
>The A, B, C are the relational expressions. The data arrives in
>transactions; one transaction can affect only one relational expression.
Eh, are these Boolean (A, B ... True/False), or are they something
like database queries?
>I may be able to place some reasonable limit on the number of components
>to a logical expression (say, 20).
>The problem is:
>(a) how to verify that the given logical expression is meaningful -
>detecting truisms like (A && ... && ~A), etc.
Recognizing a contradiction or a tautology is the archetypal NP-
complete problem; a tractable solution is not likely! Hopefully you
don't need the general case.
>(b) how to structure the logical expression for evaluation. I have maybe
>10000 of these at a time, built using say 100000 components.
>(c) structuring - are there ways to simplify a logical expression so
>that one keeps doing incremental evaluations (say left to right, or
>perhaps in a tree) until there is a conclusive result.
There are normal forms, but once again reaching them can be slow.
>(d) Any methods to reduce/normalize the expression, since (once
>implemented) speed would become an issue sooner or later.
Ditto. I think the best chance is to latch onto the particular
features of this problem; what kind of expression, what sort of transacti-
ons, how frequent... Generalities, like: maintain a list of A, B ... and
point to them to assemble expressions, or have A, upon acquisition or
modification of its value, send a message to the (sub)expressions that
contain A, and have them do likewise... probably are not enough.
>Would appreciate some help - a good reference or a cook book, pointer to
>some standard algorithms, or whatever. I need to do this in C/++.
C++ sounds fine for this... but see if you can find some "logic
engine" too. It would be great if it came as a class library.
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.