Re: Commercial compiler constructed via generator?

p.froehlich@amc.cube.net (Peter Froehlich)
10 Jul 1996 12:07:08 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Commercial compiler constructed via generator? jjyang@csie.nctu.edu.tw (1996-06-27)
Re: Commercial compiler constructed via generator? rob@ace.nl (Rob Kurver) (1996-06-30)
Re: Commercial compiler constructed via generator? p.froehlich@amc.cube.net (1996-07-10)
Re: Commercial compiler constructed via generator? CSPT@giraffe.ru.ac.za (Pat Terry) (1996-07-13)
Re: Commercial compiler constructed via generator? canalda@palinka.inria.fr (1996-07-13)
Re: Commercial compiler constructed via generator? farzu@kirika.uvg.edu.gt (Francisco Arzu) (1996-07-13)
Re: Commercial compiler constructed via generator? edcjones@access2.digex.net (1996-07-15)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: p.froehlich@amc.cube.net (Peter Froehlich)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 10 Jul 1996 12:07:08 -0400
Organization: AMIGA CITY - Public Amiga-BBS, Munich, Germany
References: 96-06-135
Keywords: tools

Hi there!


On Do 27.06.1996 around 17:43:24 jjyang@csie.nctu.edu.tw wrote:


> The problem is: Are there examples showing that a well-designed
> compiler generator doing better than hand-coded program in
> average during some compiler construction stages?


      I'm not sure if I understand your question 100% but in the report on the
COCO/R project Hanspeter Mössenböck stated that a COCO-generated
front-end for the ETH Oberon-2 compiler had a better performance than the
earlier, handwritten front-end.


      You should find the COCO/R report somewhere on ftp.inf.ethz.ch. If you
can't find it I could also mail it to you.


By(T)e...
                  Peter...
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.