Re: Functional OO

ranjit@fwasted.zk3.dec.com (Ranjit Mathews USG)
1 May 1996 22:54:59 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Functional OO mtimmerm@microstar.com (1996-04-29)
Re: Functional OO hamel@Think.COM (Lutz Hamel) (1996-04-30)
Re: Functional OO graham.matthews@wintermute.anu.edu.au (Graham Matthews) (1996-04-30)
Re: Functional OO ranjit@fwasted.zk3.dec.com (1996-05-01)
Re: Functional OO patrick_d_logan@ccm.hf.intel.com (Patrick Logan) (1996-05-01)
Re: Functional OO iainf@bristol.st.com (1996-05-06)
Re: Functional OO hans@iesd.auc.dk (Hans Huttel) (1996-05-10)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: ranjit@fwasted.zk3.dec.com (Ranjit Mathews USG)
Newsgroups: comp.theory,comp.compilers
Date: 1 May 1996 22:54:59 -0400
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Distribution: inet
References: 96-04-157
Keywords: OOP, functional

CC++, a language developed at Caltech is both functional and object oriented.


For more information, refer to
http://www.aloha.net/~ronnieb/cpp.html


|> Is there any known notion of functional object oriented semantics? Is
|> there any side-effect free language that could be called object
|> oriented?
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.