Functional OO (Matt Timmermans)
29 Apr 1996 23:32:30 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Functional OO (1996-04-29)
Re: Functional OO hamel@Think.COM (Lutz Hamel) (1996-04-30)
Re: Functional OO (Graham Matthews) (1996-04-30)
Re: Functional OO (1996-05-01)
Re: Functional OO (Patrick Logan) (1996-05-01)
Re: Functional OO (1996-05-06)
Re: Functional OO (Hans Huttel) (1996-05-10)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: (Matt Timmermans)
Newsgroups: comp.theory,comp.compilers
Date: 29 Apr 1996 23:32:30 -0400
Organization: Microstar Software Ltd.
Distribution: inet
Keywords: OOP, functional, question

Is there any known notion of functional object oriented semantics? Is
there any side-effect free language that could be called object

I know there are difficulties with such an idea, but are these two
paradigms inherently incompatible?


Matt Timmermans | Phone: +1 613 596-2233
Microstar Software Ltd. | Fax: +1 613 596-5934
3775 Richmond Rd. | E-mail:
Nepean Ontario CANADA K2H 5B7 |

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.