Van Wijngaarden grammars

fanf2@thor.cam.ac.uk (Tony Finch)
24 Feb 1996 23:33:19 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Van Wijngaarden grammars tjj@thumper.bellcore.com (1991-07-22)
Re: van Wijngaarden grammars eggert@twinsun.com (1991-07-25)
Re: Van Wijngaarden grammars dww@math.fu-berlin.de (1991-07-25)
Re: Van Wijngaarden grammars tjj@thumper.bellcore.com (1991-07-29)
Re: Van Wijngaarden grammars hugh@cs.kun.nl (1991-08-02)
Van Wijngaarden grammars bevan@computer-science.manchester.ac.uk (Stephen J Bevan) (1991-08-02)
Re: Van Wijngaarden grammars chl@cs.man.ac.uk (Charles Lindsey) (1991-08-07)
Van Wijngaarden grammars fanf2@thor.cam.ac.uk (1996-02-24)
Re: Van Wijngaarden grammars solution@gate.net (1996-02-26)
Re: Van Wijngaarden grammars mparks@oz.net (Michael Parkes) (1996-02-27)
Re: Van Wijngaarden grammars dave@occl-cam.demon.co.uk (Dave Lloyd) (1996-02-27)
Van Wijngaarden grammars dave@occl-cam.demon.co.uk (Dave Lloyd) (1996-02-27)
Re: Van Wijngaarden grammars gvcormac@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca (Gordon V. Cormack) (1996-03-01)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: fanf2@thor.cam.ac.uk (Tony Finch)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 24 Feb 1996 23:33:19 -0500
Organization: Hinc Lucem et Pocula Sacra
Keywords: parse, question, algol68

I have a couple of questions:


Have any languages other than Algol68 used van Wijngaarden grammars
for their definition?


Has anyone written a compiler generator that uses van Wijngaarden
grammars to describe the language to be compiled?


Tony (currently trying to understand the Revised Report).
--


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.