Re: if then else shift/reduce Syndrome

mab@wdl.loral.com (Mark A Biggar)
14 Feb 1996 21:17:47 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
if then else shift/reduce Syndrome tarnwb@holly.colostate.edu (Tarn Burton) (1996-02-13)
Re: if then else shift/reduce Syndrome solution@gate.net (1996-02-13)
Re: if then else shift/reduce Syndrome tim@franck.Princeton.EDU (1996-02-13)
Re: if then else shift/reduce Syndrome mab@wdl.loral.com (1996-02-14)
Re: if then else shift/reduce Syndrome theo@engr.mun.ca (1996-02-16)
Re: if then else shift/reduce Syndrome meissner@cygnus.com (Michael Meissner) (1996-02-16)
Re: if then else shift/reduce Syndrome solution@gate.net (1996-02-16)
Re: if then else shift/reduce Syndrome tarnwb@holly.colostate.edu (Tarn Burton) (1996-02-16)
Re: if then else shift/reduce Syndrome meissner@cygnus.com (Michael Meissner) (1996-02-21)
Re: if then else shift/reduce Syndrome henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer) (1996-02-27)
[2 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: mab@wdl.loral.com (Mark A Biggar)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 14 Feb 1996 21:17:47 -0500
Organization: Loral Western Development Labs
References: 96-02-123
Keywords: yacc, parse

In article 96-02-123 Tarn Burton <tarnwb@holly.colostate.edu> writes:
>Does anyone know how to get rid of the bison shift/reduce conflict in
>the C if then else.


The solution almost always used for this case is to IGNORE IT. Bison's
default action for a S/R conflict (to shift) is exactly what you what here.


--
Mark Biggar
mab@wdl.loral.com




--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.