|Re: Possible to write compiler to Java VM? firstname.lastname@example.org (1996-01-30)|
|Re: Ada design email@example.com (1996-01-31)|
|Re: Ada design firstname.lastname@example.org (1996-01-31)|
|Re: Ada design email@example.com (1996-02-01)|
|Re: Ada design firstname.lastname@example.org (1996-02-02)|
|Re: Ada design email@example.com (1996-02-02)|
|Re: Ada design firstname.lastname@example.org (1996-02-04)|
|From:||email@example.com (Ray Blaak)|
|Date:||4 Feb 1996 00:58:18 -0500|
|Organization:||Macdonald Dettwiler & Associates|
|References:||96-01-130 96-01-145 96-02-016|
firstname.lastname@example.org (Daniel J. Salomon) writes:
>Ada is really the language of the nineties: forbid
>smoking, forbid cholesterol, forbid sex. Maybe its better for me, but
>it sure takes the fun out of life.
I have always found this idea a little strange. There seems to be a
political image associated with one's choice of language: Ada is for
conservative types who like state control; C is for liberated free
thinkers with cool clothes who can dance at the edge of anarchy.
(Un)fortunately, digital computers don't give a damn about politics. A
single bit error can bring a whole system crashing down. For safe
systems, adherence to interfaces is crucial for reliable
behaviour. Using a strongly typed language enforces the *programmer's*
abstractions, independent of their political bent. At any rate, one is
free to use dangerous programming practices in Ada; it is simply more
more obvious that they are occurring.
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.