Re: sizeof(int) in 64-bit C compilers

karsten@tdr.dk (Karsten Nyblad)
28 Dec 1995 12:00:44 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
sizeof(int) in 64-bit C compilers d.sand@ix.netcom.com (1995-12-17)
Re: sizeof(int) in 64-bit C compilers ganswijk@xs4all.nl (Jaap van Ganswijk) (1995-12-18)
Re: sizeof(int) in 64-bit C compilers larryr@cybergate.com (Larry Rau) (1995-12-18)
Re: sizeof(int) in 64-bit C compilers streich@roo.mti.sgi.com (1995-12-19)
Re: sizeof(int) in 64-bit C compilers d.sand@ix.netcom.com (1995-12-19)
Re: sizeof(int) in 64-bit C compilers kennell@cs.purdue.edu (Richard L. Kennell) (1995-12-19)
Re: sizeof(int) in 64-bit C compilers karsten@tdr.dk (1995-12-28)
Re: sizeof(int) in 64-bit C compilers anton@complang.tuwien.ac.at (1995-12-28)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: karsten@tdr.dk (Karsten Nyblad)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 28 Dec 1995 12:00:44 -0500
Organization: Tele Danmark Research.
References: 95-12-094 95-12-104
Keywords: C, architecture, comment

Hi,


On VMS int and long is 32 bit. VMS is still using 32 bit pointers.
It seems to me that it is a de facto standard that int is 32 bit and
the size of long is the size of pointers.


Karsten Nyblad
karsten@tdr.dk
Tele Danmark Research
[This wraps up the 32 vs. 64 bit thread unless something unusually interesting
shows up. I know that we didn't resolve anything. -John]
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.